Crowdsourced cell site
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
AT&T
Approx. 0.6 milesApproximate site confidence built from 2 cell observations across 2 crowd samples.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
North Providence, RI
ASR matchedNorth Providence 43.0 ASR-1045809
43.0 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
DOG POUND SMITHFIELD RD
North Providence, RI
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near North Providence, RI
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 2 cell observations across 2 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: screened. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near North Providence, RI 02911
Johnston, RI
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Johnston, RI
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 1 cell observations across 39 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: medium. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Johnston, RI 02919
Johnston, RI
ASR matchedJohnston 27.7 ASR-1261189
27.7 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
316 Greenville Avenue (site # 374124)
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.