59.4
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
AT&T
Approx. 0.6 milesDerived from 1 OpenCelliD cell observations across 2 crowd samples.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Mount Laurel, NJ
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Mount Laurel, NJ
Crowdsourced cell site with 4 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 39 cell observations across 1019 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Mount Laurel, NJ 08054
Mount Laurel, NJ
ASR matchedMount Laurel 112.8 ASR-1204091
112.8 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
.49 kM NNE intersection Rte 38 and Briggs Rd
Moorestown, NJ
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Moorestown, NJ
Crowdsourced cell site with 2 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 3 cell observations across 74 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Moorestown, NJ 08057
Mount Laurel, NJ
ASR matchedMount Laurel 112.8 ASR-1244252
112.8 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
.49 KM NNE INTERSECTION RTE 38 AND BRIGGS ROAD
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.