21.6
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Park Ridge, IL
ASR matchedPark Ridge 31.4 ASR-1053267
31.4 with 1 carrier presences. Joined to nearby OpenCelliD cells within 200 meters of the FCC structure. Closest matched cell was 112 meters away.
10 W. Higgins
Chicago, IL
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Chicago, IL
Crowdsourced cell site with 2 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 5 cell observations across 146 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Chicago, IL 60631
Chicago, IL
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Chicago, IL
Crowdsourced cell site with 2 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 5 cell observations across 112 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Chicago, IL 60631
Chicago, IL
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Chicago, IL
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 2 cell observations across 51 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Chicago, IL 60656
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.