123.8
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Afton, OK
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Afton, OK
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 2 cell observations across 62 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Afton, OK 74331
Afton, OK
ASR matchedAfton 56.1 ASR-1263931
56.1 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
Just West of SR 85 / N. 500 Rd., 0.30 miles North of E. 280 Rd.
Vinita, OK
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Vinita, OK
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 1 cell observations across 48 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: medium. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Vinita, OK 74301
Ketchum, OK
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Ketchum, OK
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 1 cell observations across 33 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: medium. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Ketchum, OK 74349
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.