101.2
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Dearborn, MO
ASR matchedDearborn 112.2 ASR-1005491
112.2 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
18603 SE 65 Road (Dearborn MO 65th Rd. #87878)
Faucett, MO
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Faucett, MO
Crowdsourced cell site with 2 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 5 cell observations across 156 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Faucett, MO 64448
Dearborn, MO
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Dearborn, MO
Crowdsourced cell site with 3 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 4 cell observations across 128 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Dearborn, MO 64439
Faucett, MO
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Faucett, MO
Crowdsourced cell site with 3 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 3 cell observations across 88 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Faucett, MO 64448
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.