93.2
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Melrose, MN
ASR matchedMelrose 95.7 ASR-1024296
95.7 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
SW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 SEC 2 GROVE TWP T125N R33W
Melrose, MN
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Melrose, MN
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 2 cell observations across 59 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Melrose, MN 56352
Melrose, MN
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Melrose, MN
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 1 cell observations across 22 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: screened. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Melrose, MN 56352
New Munich, MN
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near New Munich, MN
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 2 cell observations across 61 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near New Munich, MN 56356
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.