41.1
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Rancocas, NJ
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Rancocas, NJ
Crowdsourced cell site with 2 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 12 cell observations across 247 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Rancocas, NJ 08073
Mount Holly, NJ
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Mount Holly, NJ
Crowdsourced cell site with 3 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 17 cell observations across 472 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Mount Holly, NJ 08060
Mount Holly, NJ
ASR matchedMount Holly 97.2 ASR-1046924
97.2 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
1 Academy Drive
Rancocas, NJ
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Rancocas, NJ
Crowdsourced cell site with 3 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 16 cell observations across 252 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Rancocas, NJ 08073
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.