54.2
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Belton, TX
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Belton, TX
Crowdsourced cell site with 3 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 11 cell observations across 174 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Belton, TX 76513
Belton, TX
ASR matchedBelton 16.7 ASR-1304267
16.7 with 1 carrier presences. Joined to nearby OpenCelliD cells within 200 meters of the FCC structure. Closest matched cell was 176 meters away.
500 South Hwy 35
Heidenheimer, TX
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Heidenheimer, TX
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 2 cell observations across 30 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: medium. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Heidenheimer, TX 76533
Temple, TX
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Temple, TX
Crowdsourced cell site with 2 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 4 cell observations across 129 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Temple, TX 76508
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.