77.4
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Columbia, SC
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Columbia, SC
Crowdsourced cell site with 3 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 16 cell observations across 226 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Columbia, SC 29210
West Columbia, SC
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near West Columbia, SC
Crowdsourced cell site with 3 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 9 cell observations across 200 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near West Columbia, SC 29170
Lexington, SC
ASR matchedLexington 56.4 ASR-1240637
56.4 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
3907 MINERAL SPRINGS RD
Columbia, SC
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Columbia, SC
Crowdsourced cell site with 3 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 12 cell observations across 204 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Columbia, SC 29210
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.