90.8
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Waldron, IN
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Waldron, IN
Crowdsourced cell site with 2 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 2 cell observations across 51 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Waldron, IN 46182
Shelbyville, IN
ASR matchedShelbyville 93.0 ASR-1028688
93.0 with 1 carrier presences. Joined to nearby OpenCelliD cells within 200 meters of the FCC structure. Closest matched cell was 193 meters away.
1793 South 450 East
Waldron, IN
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Waldron, IN
Crowdsourced cell site with 2 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 6 cell observations across 172 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Waldron, IN 46182
Waldron, IN
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Waldron, IN
Crowdsourced cell site with 2 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 5 cell observations across 169 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Waldron, IN 46182
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.