59.4
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Terra Bella, CA
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Terra Bella, CA
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 2 cell observations across 4 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: screened. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Terra Bella, CA 93270
Ducor, CA
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Ducor, CA
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 3 cell observations across 8 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: medium. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Ducor, CA 93218
Ducor, CA
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Ducor, CA
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 2 cell observations across 6 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: screened. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Ducor, CA 93218
Porterville, CA
ASR matchedPorterville 46.3 ASR-1291102
46.3 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
23866 Avenue 112 (AT&T CVU4212)
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.