Crowdsourced cell site
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Batesburg, SC
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Batesburg, SC
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 6 cell observations across 232 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Batesburg, SC 29006
Wagener, SC
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Wagener, SC
Crowdsourced cell site with 2 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 3 cell observations across 114 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Wagener, SC 29164
Leesville, SC
ASR matchedLeesville 94.5 ASR-1243788
94.5 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
1061 RISH ROAD
Wagener, SC
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Wagener, SC
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 1 cell observations across 44 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: medium. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Wagener, SC 29164
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.