Crowdsourced cell site
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
T-Mobile
Approx. 0.6 milesApproximate site confidence built from 2 cell observations across 33 crowd samples.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Stapleton, AL
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Stapleton, AL
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 1 cell observations across 32 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: medium. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Stapleton, AL 36578
Stapleton, AL
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Stapleton, AL
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 2 cell observations across 55 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Stapleton, AL 36578
Stapleton, AL
ASR matchedStapleton 79.3 ASR-1281653
79.3 with 1 carrier presences. Joined to nearby OpenCelliD cells within 200 meters of the FCC structure. Closest matched cell was 161 meters away.
Highway 59 1.2 miles South of intersection Hwy 31
Loxley, AL
ASR matchedLoxley 89.9 ASR-1223510
89.9 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
31770 County Road 49
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.