Crowdsourced cell site
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
T-Mobile
Approx. 5.4 milesApproximate site confidence built from 1 cell observations across 28 crowd samples.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
South Haven, KS
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near South Haven, KS
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 2 cell observations across 4 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: screened. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near South Haven, KS 67140
South Haven, KS
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near South Haven, KS
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 2 cell observations across 3 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: screened. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near South Haven, KS 67140
South Haven, KS
ASR matchedSouth Haven 68.6 ASR-1238734
68.6 with 1 carrier presences. Joined to nearby OpenCelliD cells within 200 meters of the FCC structure. Closest matched cell was 174 meters away.
S. Seneca Road
South Haven, KS
ASR matchedSouth Haven 96.0 ASR-1302816
96.0 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
2465047 1643 S. West Road
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.