Crowdsourced cell site
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
AT&T
Approx. 0.6 milesApproximate site confidence built from 2 cell observations across 2 crowd samples.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Beaver Falls, PA
ASR matchedBeaver Falls 53.6 ASR-1294240
53.6 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
1601 Darlington Road
Beaver Falls, PA
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Beaver Falls, PA
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 7 cell observations across 7 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Beaver Falls, PA 15010
New Brighton, PA
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near New Brighton, PA
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 3 cell observations across 3 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: medium. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near New Brighton, PA 15066
Beaver Falls, PA
ASR matchedBeaver Falls 78.9 ASR-1259272
78.9 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
272 Shafter Road (Geneva College Relo)
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.