Crowdsourced cell site
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
AT&T
Approx. 0.8 milesApproximate site confidence built from 2 cell observations across 51 crowd samples.
T-Mobile
Approx. 0.6 milesApproximate site confidence built from 2 cell observations across 2 crowd samples.
Verizon
Approx. 1.3 milesApproximate site confidence built from 1 cell observations across 50 crowd samples.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Manvel, TX
ASR matchedManvel 45.7 ASR-1268599
45.7 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
7454 1/2 Large Ave
Manvel, TX
ASR matchedManvel 51.8 ASR-1310487
51.8 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
MANVEL SUB, 7535 COUNTY RD 73
Manvel, TX
ASR matchedManvel 60.7 ASR-1322508
60.7 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
Off of Cedar St. (TX-09668 Wolfe Air Park)
Manvel, TX
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Manvel, TX
Crowdsourced cell site with 2 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 2 cell observations across 45 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: medium. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Manvel, TX 77578
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.