Crowdsourced cell site
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Concord, NC
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Concord, NC
Crowdsourced cell site with 2 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 6 cell observations across 112 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Concord, NC 28025
Concord, NC
ASR matchedConcord 86.9 ASR-1005920
86.9 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
3553 HWY 601 S
Kannapolis, NC
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Kannapolis, NC
Crowdsourced cell site with 2 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 7 cell observations across 156 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Kannapolis, NC 28082
Concord, NC
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Concord, NC
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 1 cell observations across 26 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: screened. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Concord, NC 28025
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.