Crowdsourced cell site
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
AT&T
Approx. 0.6 milesApproximate site confidence built from 3 cell observations across 3 crowd samples.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Round Rock, TX
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Round Rock, TX
Crowdsourced cell site with 2 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 5 cell observations across 49 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Round Rock, TX 78683
Georgetown, TX
ASR matchedGeorgetown 42.7 ASR-1226238
42.7 with 1 carrier presences. Joined to nearby OpenCelliD cells within 200 meters of the FCC structure. Closest matched cell was 154 meters away.
3595 E. Hwy 29 (374659)
Georgetown, TX
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Georgetown, TX
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 2 cell observations across 12 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: screened. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Georgetown, TX 78626
Georgetown, TX
ASR matchedGeorgetown 152.0 ASR-1228324
152.0 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
151 CARLSON COVE (BACK-UP SITE)
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.