Crowdsourced cell site
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
UScellular
Approx. 6.0 milesApproximate site confidence built from 2 cell observations across 71 crowd samples. Carrier identity is inferred from a stable regional PLMN footprint.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Duncan, NE
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Duncan, NE
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 2 cell observations across 58 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Duncan, NE 68634
Columbus, NE
ASR matchedColumbus 93.8 ASR-1295739
93.8 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
13th Street
Duncan, NE
ASR matchedDuncan 93.8 ASR-1310884
93.8 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
31578 160th Street - 2147904
Duncan, NE
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Duncan, NE
Crowdsourced cell site with 2 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 7 cell observations across 19 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Duncan, NE 68634
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.