Crowdsourced cell site
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
AT&T
Approx. 1.7 milesApproximate site confidence built from 2 cell observations across 45 crowd samples.
T-Mobile
Approx. 2.7 milesApproximate site confidence built from 6 cell observations across 268 crowd samples.
Verizon
Approx. 0.6 milesApproximate site confidence built from 1 cell observations across 32 crowd samples.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Dinwiddie, VA
ASR matchedDinwiddie 77.1 ASR-1229801
77.1 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
12300 Quaker Road (015843)
Dinwiddie, VA
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Dinwiddie, VA
Crowdsourced cell site with 3 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 8 cell observations across 167 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Dinwiddie, VA 23841
Dinwiddie, VA
ASR matchedDinwiddie 72.5 ASR-1059007
72.5 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
10613 QUAKER ROAD
Dinwiddie, VA
ASR matchedDinwiddie 67.1 ASR-1059006
67.1 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
10613 QUAKER ROAD
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.