Crowdsourced cell site
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
T-Mobile
Approx. 0.7 milesApproximate site confidence built from 1 cell observations across 27 crowd samples.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Bluffton, SC
ASR matchedBluffton 126.5 ASR-1048352
126.5 with 1 carrier presences. Joined to nearby OpenCelliD cells within 200 meters of the FCC structure. Closest matched cell was 124 meters away.
18 RUE DU GIBET (374176)
Bluffton, SC
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Bluffton, SC
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 2 cell observations across 21 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: screened. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Bluffton, SC 29910
Bluffton, SC
ASR matchedBluffton 61.0 ASR-1273172
61.0 with 1 carrier presences. Joined to nearby OpenCelliD cells within 200 meters of the FCC structure. Closest matched cell was 159 meters away.
5A Estate Drive (#273263)
Bluffton, SC
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Bluffton, SC
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 3 cell observations across 29 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: medium. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Bluffton, SC 29910
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.