Crowdsourced cell site
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
AT&T
Approx. 0.7 milesApproximate site confidence built from 1 cell observations across 13 crowd samples.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Allenwood, NJ
ASR matchedAllenwood 36.6 ASR-1037493
36.6 with 2 carrier presences. Joined to nearby OpenCelliD cells within 200 meters of the FCC structure. Closest matched cell was 79 meters away.
GARDEN STATE PARKWAY COMMUTER LOT NEAR MILEPOST 98
Belmar, NJ
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Belmar, NJ
Crowdsourced cell site with 3 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 17 cell observations across 450 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Belmar, NJ 07719
Belmar, NJ
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Belmar, NJ
Crowdsourced cell site with 3 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 14 cell observations across 399 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Belmar, NJ 07719
Belmar, NJ
ASR matchedBelmar 36.6 ASR-1273271
36.6 with 0 carrier presences. Built from FCC ASR registration data; carrier overlays come from nearby OpenCelliD cells.
3304 Belmar Boulevard (NJ08538F)
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.