Crowdsourced cell site
Structure facts
What the site currently knows about this tower, pulled from the public source stack behind the route graph.
Carrier presence
The carrier and technology hints that make this more useful than a raw tower-owner listing.
Nearby pages
Other tower detail pages within a short drive of this site.
Austin, TX
ASR matchedAustin 19.8 ASR-1004653
19.8 with 1 carrier presences. Joined to nearby OpenCelliD cells within 200 meters of the FCC structure. Closest matched cell was 88 meters away.
3301 NORTHLAND DR
Austin, TX
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Austin, TX
Crowdsourced cell site with 1 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 3 cell observations across 44 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: medium. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Austin, TX 78756
Mc Neil, TX
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Mc Neil, TX
Crowdsourced cell site with 2 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 5 cell observations across 74 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Mc Neil, TX 78651
Austin, TX
Crowdsourced onlyApproximate cell site near Austin, TX
Crowdsourced cell site with 2 carrier presences. Approximate OpenCelliD-only site clustered from 6 cell observations across 165 crowd samples within 1000 meters. Confidence: high. No FCC ASR structure matched inside the 200 meter join radius.
Approximate location near Austin, TX 78757
Why this detail page matters
The product logic behind showing a standalone tower page instead of burying the record in a generic list.
- Exact ASR structures and crowdsourced-only nodes are both listed, with the difference labeled rather than hidden.
- Tower owner is often a neutral host like Crown Castle or American Tower, not the wireless carrier itself.
- Coverage ranges here are rough carrier-level estimates derived from reported cell radii. Treat them as indicative, not exact.